Sources More than 5 current sources, of which at least 3 are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. The topic is focused but lacks direction.
Cursory discussion in all the sections of the paper or brief discussion in only a few sections. The paper is about a specific topic but the writer has not established a position. Does not tie together information. Some of the conclusions, however, are not supported in the body of the paper.
Paper flows with only some disjointedness. All web sites utilized are credible. A thesis statement provides direction for the paper, either by statement of a position or hypothesis.
For the most part, ties together information from all sources. APA citation style is used in both text and bibliography. Cites most data obtained from other sources. Cohesiveness Ties together information from all sources. The paper demonstrates that the author, to a certain extent, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course.
The paper does not demonstrate that the author has fully understood and applied concepts learned in the course. The topic is not clearly defined. Sources include both general background sources and specialized sources.
Sometimes ties together information from all sources. Novice Integration of Knowledge The paper demonstrates that the author fully understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Citations Cites all data obtained from other sources. Headings are necessary to link concepts. The writer provides concluding remarks that show analysis and synthesis of ideas.
The topic is too broad for the scope of this assignment. Does not cite sources.
Citation style is either inconsistent or incorrect. The paper demonstrates that the author, for the most part, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Paper does not flow - disjointedness is apparent. Paper flows from one issue to the next without the need for headings.
Cites some data obtained from other sources. Topic focus The topic is focused narrowly enough for the scope of this assignment.
Fewer than 5 current sources, or fewer than 2 of 5 are peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly books. All web sites utilized are authoritative. The writer has omitted pertinent content or content runs-on excessively. Paper does not flow and appears to be created from disparate issues.
Special-interest sources and popular literature are acknowledged as such if they are cited.Grading rubrics precisely describe performance expectations.
Rubrics offer explicit criteria to help students meet learning objectives. Research Paper Rubric (Word doc) Rubric for Scoring Effective Writing (Word doc) Persuasive Essay Rubric University of Wisconsin - Stout Menomonie, WI Term Paper Grading Rubric for Leadership and Character Development Guidelines for writing college and seminary-level term papers.
If the paper does not follow these rules, the following points will be lost. Points RUBRIC FOR GRADING RESEARCH PAPERS. The organization, elements of research report/paper writing, grammar, usage, mechanics, and spelling of a written piece are scored in this rubric.
Research Paper Rubric Name: _____ Date: _____ Score: _____ Category Exceeds Standard Meets Standard Nearly Meets Standard Does Not Meet Standard No Evidence Score Title Page Title Your Name, Teacher’s Name, Course Period, Date, Neatly finished-no errors Evidence of four Evidence of 3 Evidence of 2 or less Absent.
Home › Teaching Guides › Grading › Sample Rubric for Grading a Research Paper. Sample Rubric for Grading a Research Paper [Download Microsoft Word Document] Outstanding Good Fair Acceptable; Conclusion doesn't follow from the rest of the paper.
Research. Example 1 - Research Paper Rubric. Cole Library Menu Additional Navigation. Syllabi; that qualities of the paper will “add up” to a specified score or grade or that all dimensions are of equal grading value. This rubric is developed for a specific writing assignment; it would need to be revised to describe the expectations for each.Download